Archive for October, 2010

October 29, 2010

V53.99 is not a wound VAC code

A treat today … no tricks. Another clarification on wound VAC coding …

I’ve posted several pressure ulcer/wound VAC answers lately (look in the archives of this blog, or click on the keywords at the bottom of this post!) Here’s another one that I hope gets us to better coding:

Question: May we use the aftercare code of V53.99 to capture the use of the VAC?
Lisa says: V53.99 is fitting and adjustment of other device and is very non-specific. There is no specific code for wound VACs. Also consider that most wounds that require a wound VAC are complicated wounds, so what does that mean about using a V code?

You DON’T use V codes for complicated codes.

The wound VAC is simply a wound dressing, so IF a V code is appropriate, use V58.30 or V58.31. If the wound is complicated, then just code the wound. I do not recommend the use of V53.99 for wound vacs.

October 29, 2010

Look beyond payment with M1016 and ROC

I wanted to clarify the use of M1016 when you’re changing diagnosis codes at a resumption of care. In this circumstance, would you change the codes in M1016 at recertification or just keep an eye on it?

Part of the answer is looking at when you use OASIS slots with the ROC.

Diagnosis codes at the ROC are placed in M1010, M1016 and M1020/1022/1024 as appropriate.

The other part of the answer lies in looking at the overall impact your ROC may have, not just the payment impact.

Although coding at ROC does not impact your payment (except if the ROC is performed in the last 5 days of the episode) it does impact you risk adjustment on your outcomes.

Because of that impact, it is important to update your codes as necessary at ROC.

October 27, 2010

836 codes are case-mix

I’ve received some queries in the past few days wondering if the 836 codes are case-mix. They are! Your books are right!

All 836 diagnoses are Ortho 1 case-mix, and that’s confirmed in the Grouper software for FY2011.

October 26, 2010

Wound VAC doesn’t apply because a wound is healing slowly

I’m thinking of creating a pressure ulcer page on the blog … I get so many questions on these wounds! At the end of this post, you’ll see some key words in green … if you want to find all posts that deal with stage II pressure ulcers, click on that link and you will have the archive!

Question: We have a patient being recertified. She has a stage II pressure ulcer and has been coded as such up to now. There is a discussion as to how to appropriately code with the placement of a wound VAC. Some are saying to code 891.1, complicated open wound, to account for the VAC. I’m thinking that I will continue to code the pressure ulcer to the ankle with a code for the stage. There is no documentation of the wound being infected, it’s just slow to heal and is now being treated with the VAC. I didn’t think there was a code we could use to capture the VAC.

Any advice?

Lisa says: You are correct! The wound is still a pressure ulcer, and there is no code for wound VAC. Coding the wound with an 800 code is incorrect and is considered upcoding. The nature of a pressure ulcer is chronic. The 800 codes are used for trauma wounds.

October 24, 2010

Attend the HHQI Coaching Webinar!

Selman-Holman Associates is a LANE, and we wanted you to know that the HHQI National Campaign on education … this one on coaching and care transitions … is Nov. 12, and the spots are filling fast! See below, the and attached flyer, for more information.

Implementing the Coaching Model, Nov. 12, 1pm EST

Who Should Attend: Home Health Quality Improvement National Campaign participants and supporters, including home health executives, medical directors, therapists, medical social workers, home health aides, skilled nursing and hospital stakeholders; Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs)

Goals:

  • Discuss a real-world case study of how home health is making Care Transitions a reality
  • Share best practices on developing and launching a home health-based Care Transitions Initiative
  • Highlight the patient touch points, benefits and outcomes from a home health-based Care Transitions program.

HHQI_CoachRegisFlyer_final

October 20, 2010

OASIS claims are required for payment!

This seems like an obvious post, but there are agencies having trouble … note the specificity language AND the denial language regarding OASIS as a condition for payment ….

Beginning January 1, 2010, home health agencies (HHAs) were required to submit an OASIS as a condition for payment. Contractors may deny the claim as a result of not meeting this regulatory requirement. The assessment must be patient specific, accurate, and reflect the current health status of the patient. This status includes certain OASIS elements used for calculation of payment including documentation of clinical needs, functional status, and service utilization.

  • With promulgation of §484.250 as a condition of payment, entire home health claims are now subject to denial if agencies do not submit start-of-care and recertification assessments for every Medicare episode to the state. [Lisa's emphasis]
  • HIPPS code on the final claim matches that received on the OASIS validation report AND OASIS data has to have been submitted prior to the final claim.
October 18, 2010

Being on antidepressants doesn’t mean a patient is depressed

If your patient show signs of depression during the Start of Care visit, and the patient is on antidepressants, can depression (311) be included?

Not without a specific diagnosis from the ordering physician.

The patient may very well have symptoms of depression, and the depression screening scale on the OASIS may indicate the need for further follow-up. Many anti-depressants have other indications, such as neuropathy, so your patient may be on antidepressants and not be depressed.

Always be extra careful, and verify, when dealing with psych diagnoses.

Like this blog? Subscribe! Go to the subscription box in the upper right corner of www.selmanholmanblog.com and give us your email so you can get updates!

October 16, 2010

SOC dates, SOC for OASIS … how do they work, again?

I get timing questions all the time regarding SOC. Here is a recent one that should help other agencies tweak their processes or know that they’re on steady ground with CMS.

Question: Our staff are being assigned a “first visit” that will establish the SOC date (first visit being a billable visit), but not doing the SOC OASIS on that first visit.  The SOC OASIS will be done within five days.

Is this in accordance with guidelines? And here is a date-specific example: If “first visit” is 9/27/10, does that mean SOC OASIS must be completed by 10/01(include 9/27) or 10/2 (5 days after soc)?

Lisa says: Yes, the described practice is fine. The SOC date is the first billable visit. The OASIS can be done as late as five days after the SOC. In your example, if first billable visit (SOC) is 9/27, then OASIS has to be completed by 10/2. SOC counts as day zero.

Like this blog? Subscribe! Go to the subscription box in the upper right corner of www.selmanholmanblog.com and give us your email so you can get updates!

October 16, 2010

You can code HTN primary, even with medical edits

Many times, I advise against listing a chronic condition as primary unless there is an exacerbation or strong ability to show why it is the leading reason for home care. There are also multiple medical edits that flag certain diagnoses as primary after multiple episodes.

Can you safely code HTN or CHF or another chronic disease primary after multiple episodes? Yes, of course, if your documentation can support your choice.

Let’s say you have a patient with severe HTN. Her primary physician made conservative changes during the first two certification periods, and those changes did not get the HTN under control. She started seeing a cardiologist, who made several medication changes, and the HTN is finally starting to be controlled. Because her blood pressure isn’t entirely stable, she still requires teaching and monitoring.

She has a couple of chronic conditions that are controlled, but none of them involve teaching and monitoring. Medical edits such as these don’t just review the code choice. Medical reviewers are looking for skilled care, e.g. does the condition have the potential for fluctuation and thus qualify for skilled observation and assessment?

In the scenario above, you absolutely put HTN first; you are using your nursing skills to teach and monitor. Your coding may still get caught in an edit, but your documentation will prevail.

Like this blog? Subscribe! Go to the subscription box in the upper right corner of www.selmanholmanblog.com and give us your email so you can get updates!

October 12, 2010

Cough. Wheeze. Now how do we code that respiratory problem?

There is always so much confusion on respiratory codes … here is a quick guide on when to use them.

496, COPD NEC

This umbrella term means there are no exacerbations or contributing diseases.

491.20: Obstructive chronic bronchitis/COPD without exacerbation

Do NOT use this code with COPD without exacerbation UNLESS there is documentation that says “chronic bronchitis” or some other clear documentation.

491.21: Obstructive Chronic Bronchitis/COPD with exacerbation

This deals with COPD and emphysema that have acute exacerbation or are listed as decompensated.

491.22: Obstructive Chronic Bronchitis/COPD

This isn’t used often, but it is for acute bronchitis along with chronic bronchitis, including a case that has emphysema with the bronchitis.

492.8: Emphysema/COPD

Obstructive emphysema. This can also be used for NOS emphysema.

493.2x: Chronic Obstructive Asthma

This set of codes deals with chronic problems with asthma and COPD. Don’t forget the 5th digits to indicate acute exacerbation, as appropriate. This one also includes obstructive chronic bronchitis.

Chapter 7 codes involve a lot of combination coding. Make sure that you’re using both the Alphabetical Index and the Tabular List to find the right code.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,576 other followers