Archive for January, 2011

January 31, 2011

Be aware of glaucoma coding

Today is glaucoma awareness day, so let’s take a quick look at this eye disease.

The basics: Increased introcular pressure causes optic nerve damage and loss of vision, beginning with peripheral vision. Early stages of glaucoma do not have symptoms.

Most glaucomas are in Category 365, except for congenital glaucoma (743.20-743.22) and absolute glaucoma (360.42).

Two years ago, CMS removed the manifestation status of all glaucomas except 365.44, Glaucoma associated with systemic syndromes. This code is used when glaucoma is a manifestation of diabetes, as well as several other diseases.

In these cases, make sure to code the diabetes or other underlying disease first.

For congenital glaucoma, it must be documented by the physician.

January 30, 2011

CMS clarifies PPS considerations

Does any of this sound familiar?

What do I do when:

  • A patient in a new 60-day episode is discharged with all goals
    met but the patient returns to the same HHA during the 60-day episode. (PEP Adjustment applies)
  • I have a patient with a qualifying inpatient stay who returns to the agency during the last 5 days of an episodeĀ  (days 56-60).
  • My patient’s inpatient stay extends beyond the end of the current certification period. … and other such timing and care quandries?

CMS released in December and just recently updated its OASIS Considerations for PPS. This document deals with common problems, which RFA to work with, how to think about M0100 and M2200, and also has links to the Claims manual where you can find more information.

It is worth more than one look!

Like this blog? Subscribe! Go to the subscription box in the upper right corner of www.selmanholmanblog.com and give us your email so you can get updates!

January 26, 2011

Number of diabetics continues to rise

The CDC just came out with new figures on diabetes in the United States:

More than 26 million Americans now have the disease, and about one-third of adults have prediabetes.

Check out the CDC page.

Tags: ,
January 24, 2011

OASIS Q&As deal with pressure ulcers and surgical wounds

A new set of OASIS Q&As has been posted through the OCCB website.

M1020, M1022, M1024 do not get any mention, but there are several clarifications regarding wounds, and M1012 gets a nod, as well. Below are some highlights, and the link to the full set of Q&As.

M1012
Question 3: For M1012, Inpatient Procedure, can the same relevant procedure be listed twice if the procedure was done on two different dates in the inpatient facility?
Answer 3: Currently, there would be no reason or benefit to listing a procedure more than once.

M1306
Question 8: If you have two Stage IV pressure ulcers with intact skin in-between them and a tunnel that connects them underneath the wound surface, do you have one pressure ulcer or two?
Answer 8: If a patient develops two pressure ulcers that are separated by intact skin but have a tunnel which connects the two, they remain two pressure ulcers.

M1342
Question 9: When sutures are removed from surgical wounds healing by primary intention, how does it affect the healing status of the wound?
Answer 9: For the purposes of scoring the OASIS item, M1342, Status of the Most Problematic (Observable) Surgical Wound, openings in the skin, adjacent to the incision line, caused by the removal of a staple or suture, are not to be considered part of the surgical wound when determining the status of the surgical wound. The status of these sites would be included in the comprehensive assessment clinical documentation.
When determining the healing status of the incision, follow the WOCN Guidance on OASIS-C Integumentary Items, in addition to other relevant current CMS Q&As. The status of “not healing” would only be selected if the wound, excluding the status of the staple/suture site(s), meets the WOCN descriptors.

Other topics in the Q&As:

  • Influenza vaccine
  • M1300, risk of pressure ulcers
  • Explainer of “performing other ADLs” in M1400, dyspnea
  • UTIs
  • Impaired decision-making
  • M1840 and transferring … and lots more.

Looking for the Q&As?

January 24, 2011

Chime in on falls prevention

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is inviting public comment on its draft recommendation statement on the prevention of falls in older adults.

There are multiple parts of the draft, including clinical considerations and recommendations to prevent falls: physical therapy (of course!) and vitamin D.

With 30-40 percent of Americans over the age of 65 having fallen in the past year, we need to chime in!

The opportunity to comment on this draft recommendation statement is available until February 9.

January 23, 2011

What happens in Vegas, you take to your agency

Last chance for the Coding and Regulatory Symposium!

All of the coding and regulatory education that you learn at the Coding and Regulatory Symposium is too good to keep in Vegas! Attend the class this week, then bring back all kinds of information to share with coders, clinicians, billers, and administrators.

This conference is put on by Selman-Holman Associates. Take a look at just part of the agenda:.

  • April 2011 changes and how they impact your coding and operations
  • Wound care coding: Debridements aren’t surgical wounds, pressure ulcers never go away in coding, but they might in OASIS, and do you use aftercare of surgery (V58.xx) and wound dressing codes (V58.3x) together? These are just some of the confusing topics we’ll clear up.
  • The money follows proper coding. Really. Code by patient acuity and services, and the money will come. Learn the proper way to code and prioritize your codes.
  • HIPAA 5010 Compliance: Have you checked your checklist of where your agency should be in preparation for the changes?
  • Interactive coding both days! Sharpen your coding and OASIS interaction skills.
  • V57: Evil code or often-used friend? It should be a need-to-use code that has many guidelines surrounding its use … learn them and never worry about coding therapy again. Plus: learn the regulatory and billing issues behind it.
  • Documentation! Support your coding and appeal downcoding.

2 days of education for $385! And you’re in Las Vegas!
We’ll see you Jan. 27 and 28!

January 22, 2011

Medicare updates face-to-face questions

CMS has delayed enforcement of the new face-to-face rules until April 1, but they keep answering questions to clarify policy.

The questions and answers can be found on the general Questions area of the CMS website, but we’re lucky: NAHC has compiled a list of the most recent Q&As. They are below.

Q. If the required information is contained in physician documentation, such as a discharge summary from an acute care episode, will this document suffice as the addendum to the POC [plan of care]?

A. No. The face-to-face encounter documentation must be included as part of the certification form itself or as a signed addendum to it, and it must include the certifying physician’s synthesis of how the patient’s clinical condition, as seen during the encounter, supports that the patient is homebound and needs skilled services.

Q. If a facility physician completes the encounter documentation and the community physician completes the plan of care, which of the two may bill Medicare for physician certification?

A. The physician who certifies may bill Medicare for physician certification.

Q. May physicians use their own electronic medical records with drop-down menus to select from prepared descriptive language when completing the face-to-face encounter documentation for their patients? Can the narrative be typed?

A. Yes. The regulation requires that the certifying physician document how the encounter supports the patient’s homebound status and need for skilled services. We allow the documentation to be either on the certification or as a signed addendum to it. This allows the sort of flexibility where such documentation could be dictated by the physician to one of his support personnel, or to allow it to be generated by the physician’s electronic medical record software. Such is common practice for physicians to document their patient encounters.

Q. If a patient has a face-to-face encounter on day 33 after the start of care, will the HHA [home health agency] be denied payment for services provided from day 1 through day 30?

A. If the certification content requirements are not complete, the agency cannot bill.

Q. Can an HHA obtain and record verbal orders regarding the required encounter information, which are then sent to the physician for signature?

A. No. We believe that a verbal communication by the physician to the HHA regarding the encounter, where the HHA would then document the certification and get the physician to sign it, does not satisfy the statutory mandate that the certifying physician must document the encounter.

Q. What happens if the certification isn’t documented before a patient is discharged? In other words, should a discharge be “held”?

A. We are assuming the question relates to short-stay patients. The HHA should treat this scenario as it always has when the patient’s care plan goals have been met but the certification is not yet complete.

Q. Will subsequent episodes be covered if face-to-face requirements are not met timely during the first episode?

A. The face-to-face encounter requirement is necessary for the initial certification, which is a condition of payment. Without a complete initial certification, there cannot be subsequent episodes.

Q. Can a physician certify a patient’s eligibility and document the face-to-face encounter based on information received from another physician who recently saw the patient, such as the patient’s attending physician during an acute stay?

A. No. The law mandates that either the certifying physician, or certain non-physician practitioners (NPPs) who inform the certifying physician, can perform the face-to-face encounter. A patient’s encounter with an attending physician during an acute stay does not satisfy the requirement unless the attending physician is also the physician who certifies eligibility. However, certain NPPs in the acute care setting may collaborate with the certifying physician. In such cases, an NPP’s encounter with the patient during an acute or post-acute stay may satisfy the requirement.

Q. Can a resident conduct the face-to-face encounter?

A. Only the certifying physician or certain NPPs can perform the face-to-face encounter. Additionally, only Medicare-enrolled physicians can certify home health eligibility, per the Affordable Care Act.

Q. Will there be an exceptional circumstance whereby an encounter did not occur but the situation was out of the control of the agency (e.g. patient dies, changes physicians, moves, etc.)?

A. The face-to-face encounter is an additional content requirement associated with the certification. Agencies should deal with the above described situations as they always have when such occur prior to obtaining a completed, signed certification. Refer to Section 10.11, Chapter 7, Pub. 100-02.

Q. Since the HHABN Option Box 1 does not apply, do Option Box 2 (discontinue services for agency business reasons) or Option Box 3 (no physician orders) apply?

A. The HHABN, Form CMS-R-296, has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget to provide limitation of liability protections to Original Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health services under section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the [Social Security] Act for care that CMS or its contractors determines is not reasonable and necessary under Medicare; section 1862(a)(9) of the Act, for custodial care; section 1862(g)(1)(A) of the Act, for care when the beneficiary is not homebound; and section 1862(g)(1)(B) of the Act, for care provided to a beneficiary who is not in need of skilled nursing care. The HHABN must not be used to transfer liability to the beneficiary when technical requirements for payment, such as a face-to-face encounter, are not met. The HHABN is not approved for this use. A beneficiary is not financially liable if the certification is incomplete.

January 20, 2011

Coding guidelines direct you on unstageable pressure ulcer coding

I often get questions about how to code a pressure ulcer that now has a muscle flap. Luckily, the coding guidelines are clear on this point (and many others regarding pressure ulcers) in its Chapter 12 guidelines:

2) Unstageable pressure ulcers
Assignment of code 707.25, Pressure ulcer, unstageable, should be based on the clinical documentation. Code 707.25 is used for pressure ulcers whose stage cannot be clinically determined (e.g., the ulcer is covered by eschar or has been treated with a skin or muscle graft) and pressure ulcers that are documented as deep tissue injury but not documented as due to trauma. This code should not be confused with code 707.20, Pressure ulcer, stage unspecified. Code 707.20 should be assigned when there is no documentation regarding the stage of the pressure ulcer.

As a quick aside: don’t routinely use 707.20. I would only consider using it when there is a pressure ulcer under a cast or other device where the stage cannot be determined and it doesn’t meet the definition of unstageable in the guideline.

You can code aftercare after a flap or skin graft. Remember on OASIS thatĀ the pressure ulcer covered with a muscle flap can be classified as a surgical wound in M1340 only. This is where the coding guidelines and the OASIS guidance take a whole different path. After the now-flapped pressure ulcer has been declared a surgical wound, the coding guidelines still consider the muscle flapped pressure ulcer an unstageable pressure ulcer. (Pressure ulcers with skin grafts are still pressure ulcers!)

Consider this scenario:

Your patient has a pressure ulcer on coccyx that was repaired with a muscle flap. Code the aftercare of surgery first: V58.77, then 707.03, 707.25 for the unstageable pressure ulcer on the coccyx.
You have a surgical wound in M1340 and no pressure ulcers in M1306.
January 19, 2011

Followup on PT/INR … the flipside

Shortly after I posted on PT/INR, I received a question about what to do when the PT/INR fluctuates, which makes the Coumadin dosing also fluctuate. Is that enough to keep a patient admitted in home health?
Medical necessity is the key. In this case, the medically necessary service that you’re providing is observation and assessment. O and A is medically necessary when there exists a potential fluctuating condition that requires the skills of a nurse to assess and intervene.

Document well.

January 18, 2011

MedPAC recommends copays for Medicare home health

Last week the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recommended that Congress impose copayments obligation on Medicare home health patients, and that provider payment rates be cut in several ways starting in 2012 and continuing thereafter.

The National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC) strongly disagrees with these ideas and believes that there would be detrimental effects on beneficiaries and that the moves would drive up health care costs.

The MedPAC copayment proposal would require seniors and disabled Medicare beneficiaries to pay a $150 copayment for each 60-day episode of home care where they do not go to a hospital or skilled nursing facility first.

Home health had copayments in the past, but the fees were removed because, among other reasons, there was no evidence copayments saved the government money; some poor seniors could not enter home healthcare, and the costs were transferred to the Medicaid program.

MedPAC also voted to recommend to Congress that home health payment rates be cut beginning in 2012. MedPAC data shows that 35 percent of home health agencies are now paid less than the cost of care and that scheduled cuts will bring that number to nearly 50 percent by 2012.

In its annual March report, MedPAC will deliver its recommendations to Congress.

Interested in having your voice heard on potential copayments? Click here to use the NAHC Legislative Action Network NOW to send this message to your legislators.

Thank you to TAHC for providing some information for this post!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,576 other followers