Archive for January, 2011

January 18, 2011

You cannot keep a patient for PT/INR only

Question: Is it possible to keep a patient for home health only to perform PT/INR labs. Initially we received this patient for CVA. She currently is stable but still requires therapeutic drug monitoring. Every other disease process is stable and been taught on. Is therapeutic drug monitoring a valid reason, and can it be the only reason why we continue to have the patient on board?

Lisa says: Venipuncture is a skill but not a qualifying skill for Medicare home health. A patient such as you described is usually receiving observation and assessment as the skill. Observation and assessment is considered a skill only if there is a potentially fluctuating condition. If there have been no changes, then O and A probably is no longer skilled.

Like this blog? Subscribe! Go to the subscription box in the upper right corner of www.selmanholmanblog.com and give us your email so you can get updates!

January 12, 2011

CMS clarifies July 5 PECOS implementation date

From CMS:

At this time The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has not turned on the automated edits that would deny claims for services that were ordered or referred by a physician or other eligible professional simply for lack of an approved file in PECOS. However, providers have begun to see messages from Palmetto GBA, on the absent data message listing request for anticipated payment reports. Providers are reporting messages that state “Primary Physician not PECOS Verified” appearing in these reports.

Providers are reminded that claims submitted without PECOS validated physician information (Name and NPI number) will generate a warning message at this time, but according to Change Request 6421, dated December 16, 2010; CMS is re-issuing this CR with a placeholder future implementation date of July 5, 2011 for Phase 2. This placeholder date is being issued to give CMS more flexibility to determine the appropriate date for nonpayment of claims that fail the Ordering/Referring Provider edits.

CMS also released the following statement related to the updated CR:

“Due to recent inquiries, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is clarifying its policy regarding expanded ordering/referring provider claim edits.  CMS has not yet decided when it will begin to reject claims if an ordering/referring provider does not have a record in the Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS).  CMS will give providers ample notice before claim rejections begin.  Recent revisions to Change Requests (CRs) #6417 and #6421 require Medicare Administrative Contractors to delay rejecting claims until receiving further direction from CMS”.

Providers are encouraged to remind physicians or other eligible professionals who are not currently enrolled in PECOS to take the initiative to enroll sooner rather than later. If you know a physician is not yet in PECOS and/or he or she would like to enroll in the Medicare program, please advise them that the best way is to submit an application through the Internet-based PECOS.

Here are ways to verify if a physician has an enrollment record in PECOS:

1.       Check the Ordering and Referring Report.

2.       Use Internet-based PECOS to look for your PECOS enrollment record. If no record is displayed, you do not have an enrollment record in PECOS. A link to our Internet-based PECOS page is listed as the fourth (4th) link in the navigation menu on the left side of this screen.

January 10, 2011

There’s more to coding than case mix

There is more to coding than case mix, folks.

I receive this type of question all … the … time …

Do I put a case mix code in M1024 if the V code in M1020 or M1022 is not on the list of “approved” codes that trigger the Grouper to calculate case mix?

The answer I give all … the … time … Yes, code it. That code can impact risk adjustment.

So let’s step back and look at an example.

Your patient has recently resolved breast cancer (174.9), so you code V10.3 in M1022. Do you code 174.9 in M1024?

In this scenario, it’s resolved, so it’s not eligible for M1022.

According to CMS’s Grouper Software, V10 is not on approved list of V codes that triggers the Grouper to check M1024 for potential reimbursement. So do you code 174.9 in M1024 when there won’t be reimbursement for it?

I say yes. There is more to coding that reimbursement. There is painting an accurate picture of the patient’s health, and there is risk adjustment. That cancer has played a significant role in the current state of the patient’s health … why wouldn’t you code it? You can gain risk adjustment, which would impact your outcomes scores and accurately show the acuity of your patient population … why wouldn’t you code it?

I know there are other experts who disagree with my assessment, but until CMS comes out with a rule that says you do not code in M1024 when that V code in M1020 or M1022 does not trigger the Grouper to look for case-mix, I will continue to code that disease for all of the reasons listed above.

As you code, keep coding by services provided and patient care in mind. Your V10.3 may not be in the top six diagnoses. At that point, case-mix and risk adjustment become moot, but the coding of the history of cancer does not. If the breast cancer was significantly impacting care and other disease processes, that V10.3 may be in the top six diagnoses. The Official Coding Guidelines also indicate that the history of malignant neoplasm codes should be used when the cancer has been eradicated and requires no further treatment.

This all could change of course, because CMS is working on changing the OASIS treatment authorization code to include the case mix diagnoses in M1024. We’re all used to change being in home health!!

January 6, 2011

B12!!

It’s winter, and that means B12 rumors and questions.

CMS has a web page that deals with B12, and includes ICD-9 codes that support the medical necessity of using B12 injections. These include pernicious anemia, 281.0; other vitamin B12 deficiency anemia, 281.1; malignant neoplasm of trachea, 162.0-162.9; regional enteritis unspecific, 555.9, among other codes.

Note on this page that there are no codes listed under the heading ICD-9 Codes That Do Not Support Medical Necessity.

The key, as always, is documentation. The list from CMS is useful, but as long as you can show your medical need, you should be able to get coverage. Here is what CMS says regarding documentation:

Documentation supporting medical necessity of this item, such as ICD-9-CM codes, must be submitted with each claim. Claims submitted without such evidence will be denied as being not medically necessary. It is expected that documentation, if requested and reviewed, will reflect abnormally low B12 levels by testing.

Documentation supporting the medical necessity should be legible, maintained in the patient’s medical record, and must be made available to the Intermediary upon request.
Check out the B12 page here.

January 5, 2011

Is debridement a surgical wound?

Question: If my patient had a debridement, can I mark 1 (Yes, patient has at least one (observable) surgical wound) in M1340?

Lisa says: No, debridement is not a surgical treatment, and CMS clearly states this in its M1340 specific instructions: Debridement or the placement of a skin graft does not create a surgical wound, as these are treatments performed to an existing wound. The wound would continue to be defined as the type of wound previously identified.

However, debridement is a place where OASIS and coding may not always match up. For example, you can code V58.77, Aftercare of surgery of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, NEC, in some cases. For example, for a patient with a debrided diabetic ulcer of the elbow, you can code V58.77 in M1020, and then code 250.80, 707.1x in M1024. The V58.77 code as primary indicates that the focus of care is a wound that is resolving without complications and considering the complexity and chronicity of diabetic ulcers, the V58.77 code is likely not the best choice.

IF V58.77 is used, remember that as a Diabetes case-mix diagnosis, 250.80 and 707.1x can go in both M1024 and M1022, if active. This is still active, of course, so code in M1022.

Just because M1340 isn’t applicable doesn’t mean that you should forget your OASIS … M1350 includes any wounds or skin lesions OTHER than the pressure ulcers, stasis ulcers, surgical wounds already addressed, and bowel ostomies, which are also addressed in another item. The answer ‘yes’ on M1350 means that the skin lesion or wound requires intervention and assessment.
January 4, 2011

V58.73 is the code for cardiac catheterization with a stent

How do you code a cardiac catheterization with a stent? Aftercare? V55?

A cardiac catheterization is not considered an ostomy, so do not use V55 codes. V55 codes are not used for temporary ostomies. i.e., openings, because V55 deals with permanent placements. Use V58.73 for aftercare of the circulatory surgery. A cardiac catheterization by cut down is considered a surgical wound so mark the surgical wound questions (M1340 and M1342) appropriately for status of healing on the OASIS. A cardiac catheterization by needle puncture is not a surgical wound so make sure to mark M1350 as yes. M1350 deals with a skin lesion or open wound that excludes ostomy or other wounds addressed in the M1300s of OASIS.

The instructions at M1350 state: Ostomies, other than bowel ostomies, (e.g., tracheostomy, thoracostomy, urostomy) ARE considered to be skin lesions or open wounds if clinical interventions (e.g., cleansing, dressing changes) are being provided by the home health agency during the home health care episode.

The other items that would be excluded from M1350: Pressure Ulcers or risk of pressure ulcers (M1300, M1302, M1306, M1307. M1308, M1310, M1312, M1314, M1320, M1322, M1324), stasis ulcers (M1330, M1332, M1334), surgical wounds (M1340, M1342).

January 4, 2011

Hurry for Symposium discounts!

For those of you already signed up to attend, or want to attend the Regulatory and Coding Symposium, today is the last day for the $49/night room rate!

It might be extended, but we can’t guarantee it!

Want to learn more or to register for the Jan. 27-28 education?

January 4, 2011

Code ostomy takedowns by disease

An ostomy takedown, where the stoma and skin opening are closed, should be coded by the original reason for the ostomy.

If the patient had colon cancer and needed a colostomy, code V58.42 for aftercare of surgery. Code the colon cancer as appropriate for an active disease or M1024 if no longer active. If the patient had a bowel obstruction or diverticulitis that resulted in the ostomy, V58.73 would be coded for aftercare. The bowel obstruction is mostly resolved so would be coded in M1024, not M1022. Diverticulitis could be resolved or still active so the choice of coding the condition in M1022 depends on whether the condition is resolved or not.

With the takedown, the opening is no longer there, so V55.3 is not a valid code. V55 codes deal with permanent ostomies!

Remember with an aftercare of surgery code that the dressing change is not part of the aftercare, so if a dressing change is part of your care,  also code V58.3x, wound dressing codes.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,731 other followers