Archive for ‘OASIS’

April 30, 2012

Big letters count as help on M2020

CMS has clarified some behaviors that should make you mark a ’1′ on M2020. This is from the recent April Q&As.

Question: I have a patient who has macular degeneration with partial vision loss. Her son writes big letters on her medication bottles so the patient is able to correctly identify the medications. How should M2020 be correctly marked?

Answer: If the patient requires the assistance of someone, other than the pharmacy, to set-up the medications in order to take the correct dose, at all the prescribed times, the patient would be scored a “1″ on M2020, Management of Oral Medications. Set-up could include placing the medications in a medi-planner or other container or device or modifying the original medication container to enable the patient to access their medications correctly, e.g. removing childproof lids, marking the label for the visually impaired or illiterate, or pouring into individual cups.

Tags: ,
April 25, 2012

CMS answers 10 questions on F2F

CMS’s April answers document includes 10 questions on late F2F issues that have been brewing.

Some highlights include:

  • How to answer M0102 and M0104 with a new SOC assessment and late F2F encounter.
  • Whether a new SOC assessment due to late F2F encounter needs to be performed by the clinician who did the original OASIS. (No!)
  • Whether to delete an original OASIS assessment already submitted to the state.

All the goodies are here!

p.s. No new guidance on M1020, M1022, M1024

April 24, 2012

Mucosal membranes are not reported in OASIS

CMS recently stated that only wounds and lesions of the integumentary system are recorded in OASIS, not wound or lesions in mucosal membranes.

Those pressure ulcers are reported in the comprehensive assessment and documentation.

Want to see the clarification? Go to the April 2012 link.

April 6, 2012

CMS finally has some OASIS-C training

CMS has posted its first OASIS C training module, which addresses medication items.

The agency says more sessions should come online soon, including: care planning and interventions; neuro/emotional/behavioral status items; and integumentary/pressure ulcer items.

April 6, 2012

OASIS C-1 on the way … and with ICD-10

Thanks to HCLA for letting us know a little about what was said at the recent NAHC conference in Washington DC.
A CMS representative said a new OASIS … C-1 … is in the works.
Pat Sevast of CMS said the revisions are centered about the switch to ICD-10 coding.
While CMS has announced a delay to the implementation of ICD-10, “we are proceeding as if ICD-10 is going to be implemented Oct. 1, 2013,” she said. That’s because CMS’s delay for the new coding set won’t be official until it finishes rulemaking.
March 28, 2012

Don’t reverse those pressure ulcers!

I don’t know why I’ve had people ask me lately if you can reverse pressure ulcer stages for Stage I and II ulcers, but you can’t, and CMS has clarified M1324  in a recent Q&A.

CMS also clarified an M1307 question dealing with a pressure ulcer that progressed from Stage I to Stage II during the episode:

Question: If the patient had a Stage I pressure ulcer at SOC that progressed to a Stage II, how do we answer M1307 at discharge?
CMS Answer: If a patient had a Stage I pressure ulcer at SOC/ROC and it advanced to a Stage II by discharge, Response “1-Was present at the most recent SOC/ROC assessment” would be appropriate due to the fact that the ulcer, caused by pressure, was present at the most recent SOC/ROC assessment, even though it was a Stage I at that time.

Looking for more CMS answers?

March 20, 2012

How do you correct an OASIS error when a clinician is no longer with you?

From CMS Q&As …

Question: Our clinician reported an ostomy as a surgical wound in the OASIS M1340, Surgical Wound item. The clinician no longer works for the agency, so we cannot contact her about the error. Can this OASIS change be made by the DON without speaking to the clinician?
CMS Answer: You have described a situation where a true OASIS scoring error was discovered during the audit process. The assessment was complete. The patient had an ostomy, a clear, non-disputable fact based on the entire clinical record. The assessing clinician responsible for completing the assessment misunderstood, wasn’t aware, or made an error based on the OASIS scoring guidance, which states all ostomies are excluded as surgical wounds in M1340.
HHAs should have a policy and procedure for correcting errors that involves the assessing clinician. The policy should follow established clinical record professional practice standards and guidance found in relevant CMS regulations and guidance. Normally, if an error is identified through audit or review, the individual who made the original entry into the patient’s record would, whenever possible, make the necessary correction by following agency policy. A correction policy may allow the auditor who found the error to contact the clinician, discuss the discrepancy in the medical record and make the correction following your policy including information such as who discovered the error, and the date and time of communication with the assessing clinician who agrees that it was an error. Correction of an error will not impact the M0090, Date Assessment Completed.
In a case where, as you have described, the original documenter is not available, the clinical supervisor or quality staff may make the correction to the documentation following the correction policy. The supervisor must document why the original assessing clinician is not available to make the correction and how the error was identified and validated as a true error. When corrections are made to assessments submitted to state, you must determine the impact of the correction on the POC, HHRG, the Plan of Treatment, RAP and make corrections to those documents and billing, as applicable.
When the comprehensive assessment is corrected, the HHA must maintain the original as well as subsequent corrected assessments in the patient’s clinical record per requirements at 42 CFR 484.48.

CMS urges HHAs to make corrections and/or submit inactivations as quickly as possible after errors are identified so the state system will be as current and accurate as possible, as the data is used to generate OBQM, OBQI, PBQI, Patient-Related Characteristics Report and HHRG.
Follow the guidance found in CMS Survey & Cert Letter 01-12 New Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) Correction Policy for Home Health Agencies (HHAs)—ACTION and INFORMATION.

January 12, 2012

Toenail excision is just that on OASIS

CMS clarified several months ago that toenail removal by a physician is an excision, not a surgical wound. Please answer M1340 accordingly.

See more CMS Q&As here.

December 30, 2011

Gait impairment may impact M1850

CMS has provided some guidance on gait impairment and its potential impact on M1850 …

Question: When completing M1850, Transferring, do I consider the patient’s gait impairment if they must ambulate 12 feet from the bed to get to the closest sitting surface and the need for assistance of another person?
CMS Answer: The need for assistance with gait may impact the M1850, Transferring score if the closest sitting service applicable to the patient’s environment is not next to the bed. M1850 reports the patient’s ability to move from the supine position in bed (or the routine sleeping surface) to a sitting position at the bedside, then some type of standing, stand-pivot, or sliding board transfer to a sitting surface at the bedside. If there is no chair at the bedside, report the ability to transfer from the sleeping surface to whatever sitting surface is applicable to the patient’s environment and need.

If the sleeping surface is in the bedroom and the sitting surface is down the hall in the bathroom and the patient is independent moving from the supine to sitting position, sitting to standing, and then standing to sitting, but requires minimal human assistance or an assistive device to ambulate from the bed to the sitting surface, the appropriate M1850 score would be a “1″. If the patient requires more than minimal assistance or requires both minimal human assistance and an assistive device, the appropriate score would be a “2”.

Looking for the full Q&As?

December 9, 2011

When would you answer M1730 with NA?

This is part of a recent clarification from CMS on M1730, depression screening.

I don’t understand when I would ever select “NA – Unable to respond” in the PHQ- 2 in M1730, Depression Screening. Please clarify.

CMS Answer: The PHQ-2 is only used for patients that appear to be cognitively and physically able to answer the two included questions. After determining the PHQ-2 is an appropriate tool, the patient may decline or be unable to answer the questions, e.g. patient states the questions are too personal, or the patient may not be able to quantify how many days they have experienced the problems.

Look here for more CMS answers to questions.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,731 other followers